IB Teaching Guide

TOK Essay Grading Guide: Criteria, Pitfalls, and Faster Feedback

A practical TOK essay grading guide for IB teachers, including rubric alignment, feedback tips, and common mistakes.

2026-02-12

TOK Essay Grading Guide: Criteria, Pitfalls, and Faster Feedback

TOK essays are assessed using a holistic, global impression of how clearly and critically the student explores the prescribed title. That means your feedback needs to reinforce the depth of thinking and the clarity of the argument, not just surface-level structure.

This guide focuses on rubric-aligned feedback that helps students revise quickly while keeping teacher grading consistent.

What strong TOK essays show

  • Focused exploration of the prescribed title: The argument stays anchored to the knowledge question and does not drift into unrelated content.
  • Critical thinking with balance: Claims are evaluated with counterclaims or alternative perspectives.
  • Purposeful real-life examples: Examples are analyzed, not just described.
  • Clear academic communication: Ideas are structured, signposted, and connected to the central argument.

Rubric-aligned feedback checklist

  1. Can the student state the knowledge question or implicit focus in one sentence?
  2. Are examples connected back to the knowledge question, not left as isolated stories?
  3. Does each paragraph include analysis of why the example matters?
  4. Are counterclaims present and genuinely evaluated?
  5. Is the conclusion synthesizing insights instead of repeating points?

Common TOK essay pitfalls to flag

  • Descriptive real-life examples without analysis.
  • Claim-heavy paragraphs with no counterclaim or evaluation.
  • Unclear link between evidence and the prescribed title.
  • Conclusions that summarize but do not synthesize insights.

Reusable feedback prompts

  • "Clarify how this example directly answers the knowledge question."
  • "Add a counterclaim that challenges this assumption."
  • "Explain why this evidence changes the reader's understanding of the title."
  • "Strengthen your conclusion by connecting the two perspectives you explored."

A fast, consistent grading workflow

  1. Skim for the core claim and knowledge question focus.
  2. Annotate one strong example and one weak example.
  3. Score criterion-level feedback while the argument is fresh.
  4. Write 2-3 actionable next steps for revision.

Next steps

If you want faster TOK feedback at scale, use the TOK Essay Grader for criterion-level scoring and the TOK Rubric Generator to share expectations with students before they draft.

TOK Essay Grading Guide: Criteria, Pitfalls, and Faster Feedback